Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; 93(4): 422-428, Oct.-Dec. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1527719

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between patients under and over the age of 80 with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: From 2011 to 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with AAA patients who received elective EVAR. Primary outcomes included hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, and the need for re-interventions. Secondary outcomes included aneurysm-related mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 77 (62.6%) patients under the age of 80 years old and 46 (37.4%) octogenarians were included in the study. The male gender and AAA diameter did not differ among groups (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 and 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectively). The younger patients had a higher prevalence of tobacco use (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). There were no deaths during the index hospitalization. The incidence of reinterventions (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) and acute kidney injury (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) did not differ between groups, but the length of stay was longer for octogenarian patients (3 days [2-4] vs. 2 days [2-3, p = 0.04]). Endoleaks were the most common cause for re-interventions (81.8%), with a prevalence of 34% across the entire cohort. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes between groups. Conclusion: In octogenarian patients with AAA, EVAR represents a safe procedure both during the index hospitalization and during long-term follow-up.


Resumen Objetivo: Comparar los resultados inmediatos y a largo plazo de la reparación endovascular del aneurisma de aorta abdominal (REVA) entre pacientes menores de 80 años y octogenarios. Método: Cohorte retrospectiva que incluyó pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) sometidos a REVA electiva desde 2011 hasta 2017. Se evaluaron como punto finales primarios la mortalidad hospitalaria, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, la incidencia de insuficiencia renal aguda y el requerimiento de reintervenciones. Los puntos finales secundarios incluyeron la mortalidad asociada al aneurisma, infarto agudo de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular, isquemia arterial aguda de las extremidades y ventilación mecánica prolongada. Resultados: Se incluyeron 77 (62.6%) pacientes menores de 80 años y 46 (37.4%) octogenarios. La prevalencia de sexo masculino y el diámetro del AAA no difirieron entre ambos grupos (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 y 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectivamente). Los pacientes más jóvenes presentaron una mayor prevalencia de tabaquismo (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). No se registraron muertes durante la hospitalización índice. La incidencia de reintervenciones (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) e insuficiencia renal aguda (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) no difirieron entre ambos grupos, pero la estadía hospitalaria fue más prolongada en pacientes octogenarios (3 días [2-4 días] vs. 2 días [2-3 días], p = 0.04). La causa más frecuente de reintervenciones fue la presencia de endofugas (81.8%), con una prevalencia del 34% en toda la cohorte. No se observaron diferencias en ninguno de los puntos finales secundarios entre ambos grupos. Conclusión: En pacientes octogenarios con AAA, la REVA presentó un buen perfil de seguridad perioperatorio y a largo plazo.

2.
Rev. argent. cardiol ; 91(4): 278-283, nov. 2023. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535505

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: la anatomía arterial es la principal limitante para el abordaje aórtico endovascular estándar. Presentamos nuestra experiencia para la reparación endovascular de aneurismas aórticos complejos. Material y métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo en pacientes con aneurismas complejos (yuxta/pararrenales y toracoabdominales) tratados en forma consecutiva mediante: endoprótesis fenestradas (FEVAR), ramificadas (BEVAR), con EndoAnchors (ESAR), o en chimenea (ChEVAR). La decisión de la técnica fue determinada con base en la anatomía arterial. Resultados: se evaluaron los últimos 50 procedimientos (6 mujeres; edad promedio 71,3 años; diámetro 69,6mm; 3 pacientes con aneurismas complicados), de los cuales 22 recibieron FEVAR (2,8 fenestraciones / paciente), 11 BEVAR, 11 ESAR y 6 ChEVAR (1,8 chimeneas /paciente). La tasa de éxito técnico fue del 100% (ausencia de endoleak I o III con permeabilidad adecuada de los vasos viscerales). A 30 días 3 pacientes fallecieron (6%). Durante el seguimiento, 5 pacientes presentaron oclusión de la arteria renal, repermeabilizada en 4. Cuatro pacientes desarrollaron un endoleak tipo IA (3 ESAR secundarios y un ChEVAR), un paciente un endoleak IC y un cuarto uno IIIB (22%, 3 de los 11 ESAR, ninguno de los FEVAR industriales). En el análisis de supervivencia, la supervivencia global fue del 88,6% al año, y libre de reoperación del 86,5%. Conclusiones: se trata de la primera publicación en nuestro medio que muestra un enfoque global del paciente con un aneurisma de aorta complejo, de acuerdo con sus características anatómicas. Estas tecnologías ya desempeñan un papel primario en el tratamiento de estos pacientes.


ABSTRACT Background: Arterial anatomy is the main limiting factor for standard endovascular aortic (EVAR) approach. We present our experience for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study in patients with complex aneurysms (juxta/pararenal and thoracoabdominal) treated consecutively with: fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), EndoAnchors (ESAR), or chimney (ChEVAR) stents. The decision of the technique was determined based on the arterial anatomy. Results: The last 50 procedures were evaluated (6 women; mean age 71.3 years; diameter 69.6 mm; and 3 patients with complicated aneurysms), among whom 22 received FEVAR (2.8 fenestrated stents/patient), 11 BEVAR, 11 ESAR and 6 ChEVAR (1.8 chimney stents/patient). Technical success rate was 100% (absence of type I or III endoleak with adequate patency of the visceral vessels). Three patients died within the first 30 days (6%). During follow-up, 5 patients presented with renal artery occlusion, treated successfully in 4 cases. Four patients developed type IA endoleak (3 secondary ESAR and one ChEVAR), one patient IC endoleak and almost a quarter of cases type IIIB endoleak (22%, 3 out of 11 patients receiving ESAR, none of the industrial FEVAR group). In survival analysis, overall survival analysis was 88.6% at one year, and 86.5% of cases were free from reoperation. Conclusions: This is the first publication in our setting that shows a global approach to the patient with complex aortic aneurysm, according to the anatomical characteristics. These technologies already play a primary role in the treatment of these patients.

3.
Rev. argent. cardiol ; 91(3): 225-230, oct. 2023. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535487

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN El aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) sintomático no roto es una patología que involucra a aquellos pacientes con AAA intacto, pero que presentan dolor abdominal y/o lumbar atribuido al aneurisma. Esta forma de presentación clínica es po tencialmente mortal dado que su etiopatogenia comprende cambios agudos en la pared aórtica, incluyendo inflamación, lo que incrementa la probabilidad de ruptura inminente. Está claro que estos pacientes deben ser derivados a reparación del AAA. Sin embargo, el momento de la intervención es controvertido. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente trabajo fue revisar la información actualizada sobre el abordaje diagnóstico-terapéutico del AAA sintomático no roto.


ABSTRACT Symptomatic unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) refers to a group of patients with intact AAA but who present abdominal and/or lumbar pain attributed to the aneurysm. This form of clinical presentation is potentially fatal since its etiopathogenesis, involving acute changes in the aortic wall, including inflammation, increases the probability of impending rupture. It is clear that these patients should be referred to AAA repair. However, the timing of the intervention is contro versial. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to review updated information on the diagnostic-therapeutic approach of symptomatic unruptured AAA.

4.
J. vasc. bras ; 22: e20230018, 2023. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521171

ABSTRACT

Abstract A 100-year-old male patient was admitted with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm due to type IA endoleak. Given the proximity of the ruptured site to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal arteries, a ChEVAR was indicated. Catheterization of the target visceral vessels was a challenging procedural step because of an intensely tortuous thoracic aorta. This hostile aortic anatomy also inhibited exchange for a super stiff guide-wire and selective cannulation with the diagnostic catheter was repeatedly lost when guidewire exchange was attempted. To overcome this issue, a 5 x 40 mm balloon catheter was placed 3cm into the target arteries. The balloon was then inflated below the nominal pressure limit enabling safe exchange for a super stiff guidewire and placement of three 90-cm long 7Fr guiding sheaths. The procedure was thus safely performed with deployment of an aortic extension and the bridging stents.


Resumo Um paciente de 100 anos foi diagnosticado com um aneurisma de aorta abdominal roto por um endoleak 1A. Pela proximidade do ponto de ruptura com a artéria mesentérica superior (AMS) e as artérias renais, um ChEVAR foi indicado. A cateterização das artérias-alvo foi um passo desafiador pela intensa tortuosidade da aorta torácica. Essa anatomia aórtica hostil também impediu a troca por um fio-guia extra-rígido, e a cateterização seletiva foi repetidamente perdida quando a troca de fio-guia foi tentada. Para superar essa dificuldade, um cateter balão 5mm x 40mm foi posicionado nas artérias-alvo. O balão foi, então, insuflado abaixo da pressão nominal, permitindo uma troca segura do fio-guia por um fio-guia extra-rígido e o posicionamento de três bainhas longas 7Frx 90cm. Assim, o procedimento foi executado de forma segura, com o implante de uma extensão aórtica e dos stents recobertos.

6.
Rev. colomb. cardiol ; 28(4): 374-377, jul.-ago. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1351935

ABSTRACT

Resumen La coagulación intravascular diseminada es un proceso sistémico caracterizado por la activación generalizada de la coagulación, que tiene el potencial de causar trombosis vascular, hemorragia y falla orgánica. En raras ocasiones, las anomalías vasculares, como el aneurisma aórtico abdominal, pueden desencadenar coagulación intravascular diseminada crónica. Los aneurismas aórticos grandes, su disección y su expansión son factores de riesgo. En estos casos predominan los síntomas subclínicos y la coagulopatía solo se identifica mediante pruebas de laboratorio. Existe evidencia limitada basada en la experiencia de series de casos de coagulación intravascular diseminada crónica como complicación en pacientes con aneurisma aórtico abdominal. Además, la duración y la respuesta terapéutica a la heparina no se conocen bien, principalmente en los pacientes con manejo conservador. Se considera un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico debido a la baja frecuencia de presentación. A continuación, se describen las características clínicas y paraclínicas, así como el tratamiento, de un paciente con aneurisma aórtico abdominal asociado con coagulación intravascular diseminada crónica.


Abstract Disseminated intravascular coagulation is a systemic process characterized by the widespread activation of coagulation with the potential for causing vascular thrombosis, hemorrhage and organ failure. Rarely, vascular anomalies like abdominal aortic aneurysm can trigger chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Large aortic aneurysms, dissection and expansion are risk factors. In these cases, subclinical symptoms predominate and coagulopathy is only identified by laboratory tests. Nowadays there is limited evidence based on experience from case series of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation as complication in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Furthermore, duration and therapeutic response with heparin therapy are not well known, mainly in those patients with conservative management. It is considered a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to the low presentation frequency. The clinical characteristics, laboratory and treatment of a patient with abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation are described below.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation , Blood Coagulation , Risk Factors , Conservative Treatment
7.
J. vasc. bras ; 20: e20200082, 2021. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1250239

ABSTRACT

Resumo Os aneurismas de aorta abdominal (AAA) são os mais frequentes, mesmo quando comparados a outros segmentos da aorta. A prevalência e a história natural de aneurismas arteriais em receptores de transplante de órgão abdominal permanecem incertas. Relatamos a abordagem de um caso de aneurisma de aorta abdominal em um paciente transplantado renal e com alergia ao contraste. Foi realizado o tratamento convencional do aneurisma de aorta abdominal com um by-pass aorto bi-ilíaco. Para manutenção do enxerto renal, foi confeccionado um by-pass temporário da artéria axilar direita até a artéria ilíaca comum direita. O paciente foi encaminhado para a unidade de terapia intensiva, onde permaneceu estável hemodinamicamente e recebeu alta no 2º pós-operatório. A cirurgia convencional aberta com derivação extra-anatômica temporária é uma alternativa para o tratamento do AAA em pacientes com transplante renal.


Abstract Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are the most common type, even when compared to those involving other segments of the aorta. The prevalence and natural history of arterial aneurysms in abdominal organ transplant recipients remain uncertain. We report a case of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a kidney transplant patient with contrast allergy. Conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was performed, constructing a bi-iliac aortic bypass. A temporary bypass was constructed from the right axillary artery to the right common iliac artery to maintain the renal graft. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit, where he remained hemodynamically stable, and he was discharged on the 2nd postoperative day. Conventional open surgery with temporary extra-anatomic bypass is an alternative option for treatment of AAA in patients with transplanted kidneys.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Renal Circulation , Anastomosis, Surgical , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Iliac Artery
8.
J. vasc. bras ; 20: e20200155, 2021. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1351014

ABSTRACT

Abstract Duplication of the inferior vena cava is a rare congenital anomaly, with an incidence of 0.2-3%. Despite being asymptomatic, anomalies of IVC are important in aortoiliac and retroperitoneal surgeries. Preoperative CT imaging is essential to identify any IVC anomaly and to prevent unexpected hemorrhage during surgery. Here, we report a case of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in which we encountered a type I IVC duplication anomaly intraoperatively while performing transperitoneal aneurysmorrhaphy and took precautions to avoid any iatrogenic injuries to either of the two trunks or the pre-aortic trunk of the anomalous duplicate IVC.


Resumo A duplicação da veia cava inferior (VCI) é uma anomalia congênita rara com incidência de 0,2 a 3%. Apesar de assintomáticas, anomalias da VCI são importantes em cirurgias aortoilíacas e retroperitoneais. A imagem da tomografia pré-operatória é essencial para identificar qualquer anomalia de VCI e para evitar hemorragia inesperada durante a cirurgia. Relatamos um caso de aneurisma de aorta abdominal justarrenal, no qual encontramos uma anomalia de duplicação de VCI do tipo 1 intraoperatório enquanto realizávamos correção cirúrgica de aneurisma transperitoneal. Por isso, tomamos a precaução para evitar qualquer lesão iatrogênica nos dois troncos e no tronco pré-aórtico de VCI duplicada anômala.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Vena Cava, Inferior/abnormalities , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Vascular Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography
9.
J. vasc. bras ; 20: e20210080, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1340178

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background Aneurysm repair using endovascular techniques has grown in importance as materials have improved. Studies of endovascular prostheses require experimental models that reproduce anatomic and pathophysiological characteristics of human aneurysms. Objectives To describe a porcine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods This prospective cohort study used eleven Large White female pigs with a mean age of 12 weeks in two study phases. In phase I, the aneurysm was produced with a bovine pericardium patch by retroperitoneal surgery conducted under general anesthesia. In phase II, 15 days later, the animals underwent arteriography and were then euthanized before specimens were removed for histological analysis. Results Formation of parietal thrombus was observed in all animals. Microscopic analysis showed calcifications around thrombus in 82% of the animals. There was lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the graft and adjacent area, with fibrosis in nine animals. Three pigs had substantial myointimal thickening, and eight had microcalcifications. Mortality was zero, and there were no ruptures, ischemia, or surgery site infections. Conclusions This is a unique model, using inexpensive, biocompatible material. Bovine pericardium is easy for the surgeon to handle and has very similar characteristics to autologous tissue in terms of integration with the cell wall.


Resumo Contexto A correção de um aneurisma por meio de técnicas endovasculares tem ganhado importância com o aprimoramento dos materiais. O estudo das próteses endovasculares requer modelos experimentais que reproduzam as características anatômicas e fisiopatológicas dos aneurismas humanos. Objetivos Descrever um modelo suíno de aneurisma de aorta abdominal. Métodos Este estudo de coorte prospectivo utilizou 11 porcas da raça Large White com idade média de 12 semanas nas duas fases do estudo. Na fase I, o aneurisma foi produzido com um saco de pericárdio bovino através de cirurgia por via retroperitoneal sob anestesia geral; na fase II, 15 dias após a fase I, os animais foram submetidos a arteriografia e, posteriormente, a eutanásia, sendo os espécimes retirados para análise histológica. Resultados A formação de trombo parietal foi observada em todos os animais. A análise microscópica mostrou calcificações ao redor do trombo em 82% dos animais. Havia infiltrado linfoplasmocitário no enxerto e na área adjacente, com fibrose em nove animais. Três porcos tinham espessamento miointimal substancial, e oito tinham microcalcificações. A mortalidade foi zero, e não houve rupturas, isquemia ou infecção no local da cirurgia. Conclusões É um modelo único, com material biocompatível e de baixo custo. O pericárdio bovino é de fácil manuseio pelo cirurgião e possui características muito semelhantes ao tecido autólogo em sua integração com a parede celular.


Subject(s)
Animals , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Pericardium , Swine , Prospective Studies , Disease Models, Animal
10.
Rev. argent. cardiol ; 88(5): 460-464, set. 2020. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251021

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La ruptura del aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) representa una verdadera emergencia quirúrgica. Asociada con dolor abdominal, hipotensión e incluso shock, exige una transferencia inmediata a una sala de operaciones adecuadamente equipada para tratar el aneurisma en forma efectiva y sin demora. Ocasionalmente puede manifestarse como resultado de su relación con estructuras adyacentes. Dos complicaciones venosas asociadas con el AAA roto son la fístula aortocava y la compresión de la vena cava inferior (VCI). Los autores informan casos particulares de fístula aortocava y compresión de VCI con trombosis venosa profunda (TVP) por AAA roto. Los cuatro pacientes fueron tratados mediante reparación endovascular. Además de discutir las circunstancias asociadas con las complicaciones venosas por AAA, los autores también discuten la estrategia de tratamiento adoptada y las posibles alternativas.


ABSTRACT Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) represent a real surgical emergency. In the presence of abdominal pain, hypotension or even shock, patients require emergency transfer to an operating room adequately equipped to treat the aneurysm effectively and without delay. Occasionally, symptoms are the consequence of involvement of the adjacent structures, Aortocaval fistula and compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are venous complications associated with rAAAs. We report cases of aortocaval fistula and IVC compression with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) due to rAAA. The four patients underwent endovascular repair. The circumstances associated with the venous complications of rAAA, the treatment strategy used and the therapeutic options are described.

11.
Rev. méd. Paraná ; 78(2): 90-92, 2020.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1223175

ABSTRACT

A correção de aneurisma de aorta abdominal tem sido sua principal indicação o implante de endoprótese (EDV) quando a anatomia for favorável. Apresenta infecção em pós-operatório (PO) baixa, mais relacionados a procedimentos complementares. A ocorrência de fístula aorto-entérica é mais complexa, mas frequentemente associada a infecção pós-EDV. Representa um desafio operatório em um paciente muitas vezes debilitado. A antibioticoterapia é utilizada por longo tempo e de largo espectro. Neste trabalho, apresentaremos um caso de fístula aorto-entérica pós implante de EDV e a conduta que foi realizada para o seu tratamento.


The principal indication for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is the endovascular approach when the aortic anatomy is favorable. Graft infection has lower incidence, more related to re-intervations after the endovascular approach. It represents an operational challenge in a often debilitated patient. The antibiotic therapy is long and with a broad spectrum. In this work we will present a case with secondary aortic fistulae after endovascular repair and the decisions for the treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Prostheses and Implants , Vascular Fistula , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Fistula , Therapeutics , Anti-Bacterial Agents
12.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 63(8): 681-684, Aug. 2017. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-896387

ABSTRACT

Summary Objective: To investigate the positive association between the presence of simple renal cysts (SRCs) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Method: In a retrospective case-control study including subjects aged > 50 years, we evaluated the incidence of SRCs on computed tomography (CT) scan. We compared 91 consecutive patients with AAA referred from the Division of Vascular Surgery and 396 patients without AAA, randomly selected after being matched by age and gender from 3,186 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal CT. SRC was defined as a round or oval low-attenuation lesion with a thin wall and size > 4 mm on CT without obvious evidence of radiographic enhancement or septations. Patients were considered as having AAA if the size of aorta was greater than 3.0 cm. Results: Patients with AAA and without AAA were similar in terms of age (67.9± 8.41 vs. 68.5±9.13 years) (p=0.889) and gender (71.4 vs. 71.2% of male subjects, respectively) (p=0.999). There was no difference in the prevalence of SRC between case and controls. Among individuals with AAA, 38 (41.8%; [95CI 32.5-52.6]) had renal cysts compared to 148 (37.4%; [95CI 32.7-42.2]) in the control group (p=0.473), with a prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.16 (95CI 0.80-1.68). Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the prevalence of SRCs among patients with AAA and controls. Our findings suggest that the presence of SRCs is not a risk factor or a marker for AAA.


Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar uma possível associação entre presença de cistos renais simples (CRS) e aneurisma aórtico abdominal (AAA). Método: Em um estudo de caso versus controle com sujeitos com idade > 50 anos, avaliamos a prevalência de CRS detectados por tomografia computadorizada (TC). Comparamos os achados de 91 pacientes consecutivos com AAA oriundos da Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular com 396 pacientes sem AAA, randomicamente selecionados e ajustados por idade e gênero dentre 3.186 pacientes consecutivos que se submeteram a TC abdominal. Cisto simples foi definido como lesão hipodensa oval ou arredondada com paredes finas, maiores do que 4 mm em TC sem realce contrastual ou septação. Pacientes foram considerados com AAA quando o diâmetro da aorta era maior que 3,0 cm. Resultados: Pacientes com AAA e sem AAA eram semelhantes quanto a idade (67,9±8,41 vs. 68,5±9,13 anos) (p=0,889) e gênero (71,4 vs. 71,2% dos indivíduos masculinos, respectivamente) (p=0,999). Não havia diferença de prevalência de CRS entre casos e controles. Dentre indivíduos com AAA, 38 (41,8%; [IC95% 32,5-52,6]) tinham cistos renais, comparados com 148 (37,4%; [IC95% 32,7-42,2]) no grupo controle (p=0,473), com uma razão de prevalência (RP) de 1,16 (IC95% 0,80-1,68). Conclusão: Não observamos diferenças significativas na prevalência de CRS entre pacientes com AAA e controles. Nossos resultados sugerem que presença de CRS não é fator de risco ou preditor para AAA.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective Studies , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged
13.
Rev. Fac. Cienc. Méd. (Quito) ; 42(1): 189-192, jun.2017.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1005214

ABSTRACT

Los aneurismas de la aorta abdominal se presentan en el 5% a 10% de hombres entre 65 a 79 años de edad; es una patología multicausal que finalmente destruye la túnica media y altera la conformación de las fibras de colágeno de la pared arterial. Entre las principales causas se cita la aterosclerosis, enfermedades hereditarias (como el síndrome de Marfán), patologías inflamatorias y con baja prevalencia a la acción de agentes infecciosos (Salmonella, estafilococo dorado, Mycobacterium tuberculosis y Treponema pallidum). Se presenta el caso de un paciente con aneurisma de origen sifilítico, considerado una rareza médica en países desarrollados. No existen reportes en el país sobre casos de sífilis terciaria cardiovascular. Se complementa con una revisión bibliográfica de la epidemiología, clínica, diagnóstico y manejo. (AU)


Abdominal aortic aneurysms occur in 5% to 10% of men between 65 and 79 years of age. It has a multicausal pathology that ultimately destroys the tunica media and alters the conformation of the collagen fibers of the arterial wall. The main causes include atherosclerosis, hereditary diseases (such as Marfan syndrome), inflammatory pathologies and low prevalence of infectious agents (Salmonella, staphylococcus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Treponema pallidum). We present the case of a patient with an aneurysm of syphilitic origin, considered a medical rarity in developed countries. There are no reports in the country on cases of cardiovascular tertiary syphilis. It is complemented with a scientific literature review of epidemiology, clinical diagnosis and management. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Syphilis, Cardiovascular , Cardiovascular Diseases , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Aortic Aneurysm , Cardiovascular Infections , Aneurysm
14.
Med. leg. Costa Rica ; 33(1): 154-163, ene.-mar. 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-782676

ABSTRACT

El síndrome compartimental abdominal (SCA) es cuando la presión intaabdominal (PIA) es sostenida mayor a 20 mmHg asociada con nuevo fallo/disfunción de órganos. Este síndrome se puede presentar por causas primarias abdomino-pélvicas o causas secundarias. Una de las causas primarias es la presencia de aneurisma de aorta abdominal, su ruptura y complicaciones como hematomas retroperitoneales. Se ha discutido sobre la ventaja de realizar reparación endovascular (RE) en el contexto de ruptura de aneurisma de aorta abdominal (RAAA) versus la tradicional reparación por cirugía abierta (CA), tanto en reducción de mortalidad como de complicaciones postquirúrgicas. En cuanto a causas secundarias, estas están relacionadas con el manejo perioperatorio del paciente con RAAA. Se ha evidenciado que una correcta monitorización y manejo del paciente en el pre, trans y postoperatorio, indistintamente de la técnica quirúrgica empleada, tiene mayor incidencia en la disminución de SCA.


Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) happens when the intra-abdominal pressure maintains above 20 mmHg with new organ failure. This syndrome has primary abdominal pelvic causes or secondary causes. One of the primary etiologies can be the presence of an abdominal aorta aneurysm, its rupture and complications such as retroperitoneal hematoma. It has been discussed about the advantage of endovascular repair (EVAR) in patients with rupture of abdominal aorta aneurysm (RAAA) vs open repair (OR), reducing mortality and complications after surgery. About de secondary etiologies of ACS, these have been linked with perioperative treatment of patients with RAAA. It has been stablished that the right monitoring and treatment of the patient in the pre, trans and postoperative time, regardless of the surgery technique, has a better influence diminishing the incidence of SCA.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aortic Aneurysm , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
15.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Clín. Méd ; 13(4): 269-272, out-dez 2015. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-785265

ABSTRACT

Paciente masculino, 57 anos, hipertenso, etilista, ex-tabagista, com quadro anterior de acidente vascular encefálico por aneurisma em artéria cerebral média em 1998. No ano de 2013, com sintomas de cansaço e mialgias, pensava estar com dengue, não suportando ficar de pé devido às dores em membros inferiores. Concomitantemente, apresentou paralisia facial central e perda da força motora em membro inferior direito, sendo internado com diagnóstico de acidente vascular encefálico isquêmico. Constatou-se também isquemia subepicárdica lateral alta ao eletrocardiograma, apesar de o paciente se apresentar oligossintomático sob o ponto de vista cardiovascular, sendo submetido a diversas investigações angiográficas e angiotomográficas, possibilitando o diagnóstico do aneurisma de aorta abdominal infrarrenal silencioso. As inespecificidades e o quadro clínico assintomático da doença são dificuldades comumente encontradas no diagnóstico, tornando-se fundamental a utilização de técnicas complementares de alta complexidade para definição do diagnóstico por imagem. São essenciais as atualizações e pesquisas sobre o presente tema, aumentando a acurácia e a precocidade do diagnóstico, e diminuindo, portanto, a morbimortalidade dos pacientes portadores de aneurisma de aorta abdominal.


Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an irreversible aortic dilatation below renal arteries, usually, asymptomatic, showing high morbidity and mortality, becoming relevant this clinical report. Abdominal aortic aneurysm is particularly difficult to diagnose. This study aims to describe in detail the diagnostic process in several levels: syndromic functional, anatomical and etiological and commonly difficulties encountered. Male, 57 year-old, hypertensive, alcoholic and smoker with a previous history of stroke due to middle cerebral artery aneurysm in 1998. In the year 2013 with symptoms of fatigue and muscle pain, thought to have dengue, he wasn't supporting to stand up due to a pain in the lower limbs (LL). Simultaneously he suffered central facial paralysis and loss of motor strength in the right leg. Therefore he was hospitalized with a diagnosis of a new stroke. He showed also high lateral subepicardial ischemia on electrocardiogram, although he had a few atipical cardiovascular symptoms. The patient was submitted to diverse angiographic and angiotomographies investigations, allowing the precise diagnosis of a silent infrarenal Abdominal aortic aneurysm . The authors present a clinical case of infrarenal Abdominal aortic aneurysm, reporting diferentt clinical procedures. The report also discusses the endovascular therapeutic approach and the clinical screening and diagnostic methods. The unspecific and asymptomatic clinical picture of this disease were commonly found difficulties in diagnosis, becoming essential the use of complementary techniques of high definition for diagnostic imaging. Updates are required and research on this topic increasing the accuracy for an early diagnosis and treatment, reducing therefore the morbidity and mortality of these patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Stroke , Hypertension
16.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 12(4): 499-501, Oct-Dec/2014. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-732463

ABSTRACT

O avanço tecnológico da cirurgia endovascular no tratamento de aneurismas de aorta vem permitindo que uma maior quantidade de pacientes, antes considerados inaptos para essa abordagem, beneficie-se dessa modalidade terapêutica. Apesar da atual disponibilidade de endopróteses com alta conformabilidade, casos com anatomia desfavorável permanecem um desafio para os cirurgiões. Descrevemos um caso anatomicamente desfavorável, resolvido com sucesso pela técnica endovascular, utilizando-se uma manobra não convencional.


The advances in endovascular surgery for treatment of aortic aneurysms have allowed a greater number of patients, who were previously considered unsuitable for the approach, to benefit from this therapeutic modality. Despite the current availability of highly comfortable endografts, cases with unfavorable anatomy remain a challenge for surgeons. We report a case with difficult anatomy that was successfully managed using an unconventional endovascular technique.


Subject(s)
Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
17.
J. vasc. bras ; 13(4): 266-271, Oct-Dec/2014. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-736020

ABSTRACT

Background: Endovascular repair has become established as a safe and effective method for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. One major complication of this treatment is leakage, or endoleaks, of which type 2 leaks are the most common. Objective: To conduct a brief review of the literature and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of embolization by micronavigation for treatment of type 2 endoleaks. Method: A review of medical records from patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms identified 5 patients with persistent type 2 endoleaks. These patients were submitted to embolization by micronavigation. Results: In all cases, angiographic success was achieved and control CT scans showed absence of type 2 leaks and aneurysm sacs that had reduced in size after the procedure. Conclusion: Treatment of type 2 endoleaks using embolization by micronavigation is an effective and safe method and should be considered as a treatment option for this complication after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. .


Contexto: O reparo endovascular se estabeleceu como uma modalidade segura e efetiva no tratamento do Aneurisma de Aorta Abdominal. Uma das principais complicações deste tipo de tratamento é o Vazamento ou Endoleak, sendo o do tipo 2 o mais frequente deles. Objetivo: Fazer uma breve revisão de literatura e avaliar a segurança e a efetividade da embolização por micronavegação para o tratamento do Vazamento tipo 2. Método: A revisão dos prontuários dos pacientes submetidos ao Reparo Endovascular do Aneurisma de Aorta abdominal identificou cinco pacientes que apresentavam Endoleak tipo 2 persistente. Esses pacientes foram submetidos à embolização por micronavegação. Resultado: Em todos os casos, houve sucesso angiográfico e as tomografias de controle evidenciavam ausência de Vazamento tipo 2 e diminuição do saco aneurismático, após o procedimento. Conclusão: O tratamento do Endoleak tipo II por embolização por micronavegação é um método efetivo e seguro, sendo considerado uma opção para esta complicação após o Reparo Endovascular do Aneurisma de Aorta Abdominal. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endoleak/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Effectiveness , Treatment Outcome , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging
18.
J. vasc. bras ; 13(4): 276-284, Oct-Dec/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-736016

ABSTRACT

Context: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a condition that is usually asymptomatic, but potentially fatal, and has a prevalence in men over 60 years old ranging from 4.3% to 8%. There are two treatment options available: open surgery (OS) and endovascular treatment (ET). Objective: To compare the results of repairs conducted using these two treatment methods from 2008 to 2013 in a tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing 119 patients treated with OS and 219 patients who underwent ET for AAA repair. Results: The ET group was older (71.3 vs. 68.2 years; p<0.001) and had a higher rate of coronary disease (44.7% vs. 27.7%; p=0.002) and a lower ejection fraction (57.6% vs. 64.3%; p<0.001); in turn, the OS group had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.0% vs. 5.9%; p=0.004) and a smaller proximal infrarenal neck (15.5 mm vs. 23.0 mm; p<0.001). However, there was no difference in ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiology) (p=0.36). The ET group had less intraoperative bleeding (171 mL vs. 729 mL; p<0.001) and required fewer blood transfusions (11.9% vs. 73.1% p<0.001), and spent shorter stays in both ICU (2.4 vs. 3.5 days; p=0.002) and hospital (5.8 vs. 10.3 days; p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was similar (OS 5.0% vs. ET 4.1%; p=0.78) and there was also no difference in postoperative complications. The average cost of ET was higher (R$34,277.76 vs. R$4,778.60; p<0.001). Conclusions: Rates of morbidity and mortality were similar, although ET was associated with less bleeding, fewer transfusions and shorter hospital stays, but was more expensive. .


Contexto: O aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) é uma condição frequentemente assintomática, porém potencialmente fatal, cuja prevalência em homens com 60 anos ou mais está entre 4,3% e 8%. Existem duas modalidades de tratamento disponíveis: cirurgia aberta (TA) e endovascular (TE). Objetivo: Comparar os resultados dessas duas modalidades de tratamento, entre 2008 e 2013, em um hospital terciário. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva comparando 119 pacientes submetidos ao TA e 219 pacientes submetidos ao TE, para correção de AAA. Resultados: O grupo submetido ao TE apresentou maior idade (71,3 vs. 68,2 anos; p<0,001) e doença coronariana (44,7% vs. 27,7%; p=0,002), além de menor fração de ejeção (57,6% vs. 64,3%; p<0,001); por sua vez, o grupo submetido ao TA exibiu mais doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (16,0% vs. 5,9%; p=0,004) e menor colo proximal infrarrenal (15,5 mm vs. 23,0 mm; p<0,001). Entretanto, não houve diferença na classificação ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) (p=0,36). O grupo de TE apresentou menor sangramento intraoperatório (171 mL vs. 729 mL; p<0,001), com menor necessidade de hemotransfusão (11,9% vs. 73,1% p<0,001), menor permanência em UTI (2,4 vs. 3,5 dias; p=0,002) e menor tempo de internação hospitalar (5,8 vs. 10,3 dias; p<0,001). A mortalidade em 30 dias foi semelhante (TA 5,0% vs. TE 4,1%; p=0,78), também não havendo diferença nas complicações pós-operatórias. O custo médio do TE foi maior (R$34.277,76 vs. R$4.778,60; p<0,001). Conclusão: As taxas de morbimortalidade foram semelhantes, sendo no TE o sangramento, a necessidade transfusional e a duração da internação hospitalar menores, porém com custo mais elevado. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Postoperative Period , Stroke Volume , Coronary Artery Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Intraoperative Complications , Length of Stay
19.
J. vasc. bras ; 12(1): 62-67, jan.-mar. 2013. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-670391

ABSTRACT

O rim em ferradura é uma das anomalias urológicas congênitas mais comuns e está presente em cerca de 0,12% dos pacientes com aneurisma de aorta abdominal. O reparo cirúrgico convencional está associado a dificuldades técnicas que provavelmente aumentam a morbidade e a mortalidade, mas que podem ser evitadas com o tratamento endovascular. Relatamos um caso de um paciente de 64 anos com rim em ferradura e aneurisma de aorta abdominal, que foi submetido ao reparo endovascular do aneurisma com sucesso.


The horseshoe kidney is one of the most common urologic anomalies and is present in about 0,12% of the patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. The conventional surgical repair is associated with technical difficulties that probably increase morbidity and mortality, but can be averted by the endovascular treatment. We report a case of a 64-year-old patient with horseshoe kidney and abdominal aortic aneurysm, who underwent endovascular repair with success.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/congenital , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Kidney/abnormalities , Angioplasty/methods , Physical Examination/nursing
20.
Rev. argent. cir. cardiovasc. (Impresa) ; 9(3): 192-204, sept.-dic. 2011. tab, graf, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-703267

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes: El propósito de este estudio es comparar la morbilidad y la mortalidad tanto de la reparación abierta (RA) como endovascular de la ruptura del aneurisma aórtico abdominal(rAAAs); y de presentar un algoritmo para el tratamiento y evaluaciones de la tomografía computarizada (CT) para determinar el uso de un balón oclusivo supra-celíaco. Métodos: Una revisión gráfica retrospectiva se realizó de los rAAAs tratados ya sea con reaparicióna cielo abierto (RA), ya sea con reparación aórtica endovascular (EVAR) entre junio de 1998 y junio de 2009. Se informaron las co-morbilidades, los datos peri-procedimientos y tanto la morbosidad como la mortalidad. Las TC se revisaron desde el uso inicial del balón oclusivo (Marzo de 2001) a fin de evaluar el hematoma retroperitoneal. Se desarrolló un algoritmo para determinarcuándo el balón oclusivo se debería implementar. El test exacto de Fisher, el t-test, y el test log rank fueron los que se utilizaron para el análisis estadístico.Resultados: Entre junio de 1998 y junio de 2009, 105 pacientes, 75 (71.4%) hombres, edad promedio de 74 años (rango 47-93) presentaron un rAAA y a 69 (65.2%) se les realizó la reparación a cielo abierto. 87 pacientes (82.9%) fueron sintomáticos y 25 (23.8%) tenían un AAA conocido. El tiempo medio transcurrido entre el diagnóstico y el tratamiento fue de 5 a 6 horas, 4.5 horas para la RA y de 8 horas para EVAR. El test rank log mostró una mejoría en la supervivencia con EVARa pesar del tiempo promedio más prolongado desde el diagnóstico al tratamiento. (p=0.02). Se administraron casi tres veces más concentrados de hematíes en el cohorte de reparación a cielo abierto (RA), 6.3 unidades y en EVAR 2.2 unidades. Se utilizaron vasopresores perioperatorios en el 57.1% de los casos, dos veces más en la RA, 69.6%, que con EVAR 33.3%. Se utilizó el balón oclusivo aórtico en el 27,6% de los casos, dos veces más frecuente en RA que en EVAR (41,7% verus 20,3%)...


Antecedentes: O propósito deste estudo é comparar a morbilidade e a mortalidade tanto da reparação aberta (RA) quanto endovascular, utilizadas no tratamento da ruptura do aneurisma aórtico abdominal (rAAAs); e de apresentar um algorítmo para o tratamento e avaliações da tomografiacomputarizada (CT) para assim determinar o uso de um balão para oclusão supra-celíaca. Métodos: Realizou-se uma revisão gráfica retrospectiva das rAAAs tratadas, seja com reparação a céu aberto (RA), ou com reparação aórtica endovascualar (EVAR) entre os meses de junho de1998 e junho de 2009. Informaram-se as comorbilidades, os dados periprocedimentos , além da morbidade e mortalidade. As TC foram revisadas desde o uso inicial do balão oclusivo (março de 2001) com o objetivo de avaliar o hematoma retroperitoneal. Desenvolveu-se um algorítmo para determinar quando o balão oclusivo deveria ser implementado. Para esta análise estatística, utilizaram-se o teste exato de Fisher, o t-test, e o test log Rank. Resultados: Entre junho de 1998 ejunho de 2009, 105 pacientes, 75 (71.4%) homens, com média de idade de 74 anos (média 47-93) apresentaram uma rAAA e em 69 (65.2%) realizou-se uma reparação a céu aberto. 87 pacientes (82.9%) foram sintomáticos e 25 (23.8%) tinham um AAA conhecido. O tempo médio transcorrido entre o diagnóstico e o tratamento foi de 5 a 6 horas, 4.5 horas para a RA e de 8 horas para aEVAR. O test rank log mostrou uma melhoria na sobrevivência com a EVAR, apesar do tempo médio mais prolongado do diagnóstico ao tratamento. (p=0.02). Administraram-se quase três vezes mais concentrados de hematies no grupo de reparação a céu aberto (RA), 6.3 unidades e no grupo EVAR, 2.2 unidades. Utilizaram-se vasopressores perioperatórios em 57.1% dos casos: 33.3% com EVAR e 69.6% com a RA, ou seja, duas vezes a mais. Utilizou-se o balão oclusivo aórtico em 27.6 % dos casos, duas vezes mais frequente nos casos da RA do que nos de EVAR (41.7 % versus 20.3%)...


Background: The purpose of this study is to compare morbidity and mortality of open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs); and present a treatment algorithm and assessment of computer tomography (CT) to determine usage of a supra-celiac occlusive balloon.Methods: Restrospective chart review was done of rAAAs treated with open (OR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) between June 1998 and June 2009. Comorbidities, periprocedural data, and postoperative morbidity and mortality were recorded. CTs were reviewed from the initial use of the occlusive balloon (March 2001) to assess the retroperitoneal hematoma. An algorithm was developed determining when the occlusive balloon should be implemented. Fisher’s exact test, and log rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Between June 1998 and June 2009, 105 patients, 75 (71.4%) males, mean age of 74.0 years (range 47-93), presented with a rAAA and 69 (65.2%) received open repair. Eighty-seven patients(82.9%) were symptomatic and 25 (23.8%) had a known AAA. Mean time elapsed between diagnosis to treatment was 5.6 hours, 4.5 hours for OR and 8.0 hours for EVAR. Log rank test showsimproved survivability with the EVAR despite higher mean time from diagnosis to intervention (p=0.02). Nearly three times as much packed red blood cells were given in open repair cohort, O,6.3 units and EVAR, 2.2 units. Perioperative vasopressors were used in 57.1% of total cases, more than 2 times as often for O, 69.6%, and EVAR, 33.3%. Aortic occlusive balloon was used in 27.6% of cases, twice as often in EVAR (41.7% versus 20.3%)...


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/therapy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/mortality , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL